Summary of Media Influence Models and Theories
Theory Summary Origin Date Linear Active Sub and related theories
Bullet/Hypodermic

This theory suggests there is one single interpretation of a message, i.e. that all audiences are equal.

The message is sent directly from the sender to the receiver without interference.

The media has all the power, audiences have no power at all.

Frankfurt School

1930s Yes No

Laswell (1948)

Shannon Weaver (1949)

All these theories are linear, later versions add 'noise' and acknowledge the feedback of the audience.

Uses and Gratification

This theory suggests that messages are used in different ways by different audiences. Each audience member may use a media message in a different way depending on their circumstances at a given time. For example, you may watch the weather to find out if you need to wear your blazer on a school day, on the weekend you may watch the weather be deciding to go to the beach with friends. Furthermore, you may watch television to get information (the weather) or you may be watching to 'veg out'. In either case you are still considered to be 'active' because you have chosen to 'veg out' in front of the television instead of reading a book or going to bed.

Key words.

Instrumental / Ritualistic

Surveillance / Personal Identity / Personal Relationships / Diversion

Katz, Blumler, & Gurevitch 1974 No Yes

Catharsis (Feshback and Singer -1971)

Reinforcement

This theory suggests that the message can only reinforce knowledge that you already have.The media will, therefore, have little influence because you already have, for example, negative reporting of violence against Indian students may reinforce an already held belief that there are too may foreign students in Australian Universities.

This theory fails when new or unexplained material is presented as there is no reference point for the audience to compare the event to.

Klapper 1970s No Yes

Dependency (DeFleur and Ball-Rokeach - 1976) The more a person is dependant on the media for having his/her needs fulfilled, the more important the media will be to that person.

Cultivation (George Gerbner) The media, in particular TV are the main source of storytelling in our society. The media seeks to cultivate ideas in the receiver by telling them how the world exists. Research has concentrated on the attitudes rather than actions of the receiver. From this idea comes the Mean World and Scary Syndrome. This suggests that by watching television in particular, you will gather a distorted view of the world in particular with reference to violence. You will develop the notion that world is a much more violent place than it really is.

Agenda Setting Function

This theory suggests that the media does not tell audiences what to think, but what to think about. That is, the media sets an agenda.

This theory argues that a gate keeping process takes place that controls the flow of information. (Selection, Omission, and Construction.)

McCombs & Shaw 1972 No Yes David Berto - SMCR. Although this model take the form of linear models such as the Hypodermic theory, there are a number of differences. The Source itself is influenced by a range of outside factors. These factors go beyond the original feedback loop. The Message is informed by these source factors
Postmodern

This theory suggests that the media itself has little or no power to influence an audience. This is because each time a text is 'viewed' the audience will interpret the text in a new and different way. There are multiple meanings, in multiple texts, that can be obtained from multiple media sources. There is an element of Reception Context here because a given text will have a different meaning depending on where it is received.

Under this model, by definition, the audience is always active. This is because your mood will change, and you will have aged, interacted with people and other media, and generally 'grown' as a person since the last viewing, even if that growth is very small.

A general development of ideas from literature and other Arts streams. 1980s onwards No Yes Semiotics. Semiotics is the study of symbols. These symbols might simply be the colour of an object that appears in a film. (For example, the colour of a costume an actor wears will affect how we perceive that character.) A more advanced meaning is the use of language. We all use codes in the way we speak to each other. Both sender and receiver need to understand that code to communicate with one-another. In the media, news may use "loaded" language when reporting. A good example of this can be seen on page 87 of the Heinemann media text book. The table shows the different language used in describing the armed forces from both sides of a conflict. Our side is described in positive language, whilst the opposing side is described in negative language. In day to day life we are generally not conscious of "loading" our language, but as we are influenced by the media, and those around us, we subconsciously develop both our language and our understanding of symbols within the media. (Think of learning to drive, it is a difficult task initially, but the actual control of the car becomes a subconscious - invisible - part of the task.)